Daniel Berta vs Jarryd Chaplin Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W W W
Form
L L W L L W L W L LCara A Cara: Berta 0 - 0 Chaplin
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No hay coincidencias H2H disponibles
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Daniel Berta
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-7(3) 6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Jarryd Chaplin
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
12
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Jianhui Li
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Christopher Rosensteel
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabiano De Paula
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Mark Oljaca
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (43/51) | Win/Loss | 51% (73/71) |
| 45% (96/116) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (162/161) |
| 49% (968/1017) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1539/1481) |
| 55% (12/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (66/58) |
| 38% (14/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 50% (17/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 21 | Aces Total | 268 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 219 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 486.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.17 |
| 53% (225/427) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1914/3095) |
| 62% (139/225) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1347/1914) |
| 51% (104/202) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (536/1181) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (75/210) |
| 30% (113/383) | Return Points Win % | 34% (984/2904) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (8/6) | Challenger W/L | 28% (9/23) |
| 49% (35/37) | Futures W/L | 58% (64/47) |
| 45% (42/93) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (73/143) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (12/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (16/45) |
| 56% (14/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 81% (42/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (75/64) |
| 19% (42/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (75/10) |
| 17% (52/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (69/9) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
